1061. Implementing Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Emergency Department: the Role of Procalcitonin for Diagnosis of Bacterial Infection in Older Adults
Session: Poster Abstract Session: Stewardship: Improving Treatments
Friday, October 4, 2013
Room: The Moscone Center: Poster Hall C
Posters
  • Leininger Poster 1061_Final.pdf (2.0 MB)
  • Background: Infection is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in older adults presenting to the emergency department (ED).  Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have been successfully implemented in inpatient populations but comprehensive ASP programs in the ED are rare.  Biomarkers such as procalcitonin (PCT) can help rapidly identify infection in a way that is well-suited to the ED, and prior studies have shown that PCT can be used to optimize antimicrobial use.

    Methods: We screened every patient over the age of 65 who presented to the ED at a large academic medical center from 12/13/13 to 4/11/13 (target enrollment=240).  Informed consent was followed by bedside interview, medical record abstraction, and blood draw.  PCT levels were obtained using a VIDAS BRAHMS PCT instrument.  The treating ED physicians were surveyed about the estimated likelihood of infection.  An Infectious Disease physician review of each patient’s full medical record to determine the presence of true infection was the gold standard.  Treating physicians and reviewers were blinded from the results of the PCT.

    Results: Among 368 eligible patients, 90 were enrolled (ages 65 to 94).  Of the enrolled patients, 24 (26.67%) met SIRS criteria in the ED, and 30 (33.33%) were diagnosed with bacterial infection by the gold standard reviewer.  Of these bacterial infections, the most common were pneumonia (8 [26.67%]), urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis (6 [20%]), and bacteremia (4 [13.33%]).  PCT levels were compared at two cutoffs, 0.2 ng/ml (positive in 21 [23.33%]) and 0.5ng/ml (positive in 11 [12.22%]).  Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the following scenarios:   0.2 ng/ml cutoff for any bacterial infection, 45% and 85%; 0.5 ng/ml cut off 26.7% and 95%; 0.2 ng/ml cut off for SIRS patients, 64.3 % and 60%; 0.5 ng/ml cut off 42.9% and 90%.  ROC area under the curve for PCT in all patients was 0.6772 and 0.7857 for those with SIRS.

    Conclusion: PCT was specific but not sensitive for identifying true infection in older adults presenting to the ED at a large academic center.  ASPs are needed in the ED, and PCT may have a role in determining appropriate use of antimicrobials but further studies are needed.

    Robert Leininger, MD, Kurt Stevenson, MD, MPH and Jeffrey Caterino, MD, MPH, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH

    Disclosures:

    R. Leininger, None

    K. Stevenson, None

    J. Caterino, None

    Findings in the abstracts are embargoed until 12:01 a.m. PST, Oct. 2nd with the exception of research findings presented at the IDWeek press conferences.