102. Clinical Utility of Rapid Molecular-Based Influenza Testing
Session: Oral Abstract Session: Diagnostics: Typing/Sequencing
Thursday, October 8, 2015: 11:15 AM
Room: 7--AB
Background: Diagnosing influenza in the emergency department (ED) remains a challenge as clinicians have not had, until recently, reliable tests to accurately and rapidly diagnose influenza; however, rapid diagnosis is crucial to begin antiviral therapy in patients with, or at risk of influenza-related complications, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  A new generation of rapid molecular-based tests, including Xpert Flu (Cepheid), have recently demonstrated high sensitivity (95%) and specificity (99%), allowing for timely and accurate influenza diagnosis, and improved use of antivirals in the ED. We sought to evaluate the impact of rapid molecular-based influenza testing on clinician decision-making for antiviral administration in ED patients with, or at increased risk for influenza related complications.

Methods: We performed a multi-center prospective controlled trial at 4 US EDs.  From November 2013 – April 2014 we enrolled adults who presented to the ED with an acute respiratory illness who would meet CDC criteria for antiviral treatment if influenza positive.  The test sites (2 EDs) performed Xpert Flu testing on all enrolled participants and the result was given to the ED provider.  The control sites (2 EDs) continued usual care with provider-directed influenza testing using either rapid antigen tests or traditional PCR.  All subjects received influenza testing with gold-standard PCR; however, this result was not given to the clinical team.  Using gold-standard PCR to define influenza status, we compared antiviral treatment rates between the test sites and the control sites in both influenza positive and negative subjects using a chi-squared test.

Results: Of 1987 enrolled subjects, 185 (9.3%) had influenza. Amongst influenza positive subjects, the test sites had significantly higher rates of antiviral treatment (61, 72%) compared to the control sites (23, 21%) (p < 0.001).  The test group also had higher rates of antiviral treatment (41, 4.4%) in influenza negative subjects compared to the control group (8, 1.0%) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Integrating highly sensitive molecular-based influenza testing into ED practice impacts antiviral treatment, and increases adherence with CDC antiviral treatment guidelines.

Andrea Dugas, MD, PhD, Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD and Richard Rothman, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD

Disclosures:

A. Dugas, None

R. Rothman, None

Findings in the abstracts are embargoed until 12:01 a.m. PDT, Wednesday Oct. 7th with the exception of research findings presented at the IDWeek press conferences.