1408. How to 'Excel' at Antimicrobial Stewardship without Clinical Decision Support System
Session: Poster Abstract Session: Antimicrobial Stewardship: Interventions
Saturday, October 10, 2015
Room: Poster Hall
Background: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) rely on electronic tools to report and trend antibiotic prescription.  Because of the newness of ASPs and lack of resources, many hospitals do not have clinical decision support systems.  Novel tools to produce and analyze data need to be developed to improve quality of patient care, slow emergence of resistance and comply with regulations.

Methods: University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC) is an 800-bed tertiary care hospital with an average of 600 antimicrobials prescribed daily.  The UMMC ASP consists of 2 part-time adult Infectious Diseases (ID) physicians and one clinical ID pharmacist.  ID consults on 70% of patients prescribed IV antibiotics.  An antibiotic report is generated daily containing patient identifiers, antibiotic, dose, frequency, primary service, prescriber, and ID consulting team.  Using Excel, the list is abstracted to generate a database for analyzing antibiotic appropriateness, defined as ASP agreement with original prescription, and for recording interventions.  Beginning in October 2014, the ASP implemented a modified 48-hour antibiotic timeout (M48AT) for all antibiotics prescribed without ID consult as well as a subset of restricted antibiotics in all patients.  Newly prescribed restricted antimicrobials are reviewed within 24 hours.

Results: There were 1012 antibiotic reviews in adult patients during a 6-month period (10/1/14 – 3/31/15).  The majority of reviews were for M48AT without ID consult (75%), followed by M48AT with ID consult (14%) and bug-drug mismatches (2%).  Most of the reviewed antibiotics were appropriate requiring no intervention (54%).  Of the 469 interventions, 43% were ID consult requests, 28% were de-escalate therapy, 10% were change to effective therapy or escalate therapy, and 4% were change in duration of therapy.  In addition, we identified a method of ascertaining specific prescriber patterns with attention to those prescribers that deviate from standard best practice.

Conclusion: Our ASP model is a proof of principle demonstrating a functional ASP using Excel in a setting of resource limitations.  Further work is needed in implementing education and feedback to prescribers, as well as assessing the success of our program with outcome metrics.

Jacqueline Bork, MD1, Emily Heil, PharmD2, Lisa Pineles, MA3 and Michael Kleinberg, MD, PhD1, (1)Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, (2)Division of Infectious Disease, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, (3)Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Disclosures:

J. Bork, Alk-Abello: Investigator , Educational grant

E. Heil, Alk-Abello: Investigator , Educational grant

L. Pineles, None

M. Kleinberg, None

Findings in the abstracts are embargoed until 12:01 a.m. PDT, Wednesday Oct. 7th with the exception of research findings presented at the IDWeek press conferences.