
Methods: Data regarding patient outcomes was abstracted from prior work.1 The main cost of the intervention was the cost for an 0.8 full-time equivalent pharmacist. A Markov Model for cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out over a twelve-month time horizon from the societal perspective, which includes costs to the patient and to the healthcare system. We used 1,000 Monte-Carlo simulations to carry out probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
Results:
Compared to standard of care (average cost per OPAT patient, $56.257.65 and 5.716 life-years by the end of the year), the IDTS improved survival at a lower cost (average cost per OPAT patient, $47,191.96 and 5.734 life-years). This led to a deterministic incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -$498,410.75 per life-year gained suggesting that IDTS intervention dominates standard of care approach. This compares well with the widely-accepted willingness to pay threshold of $50,000 per life-year gained. Based on this, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that IDTS compared to standard of care was cost-effective in 71% of Monte-Carlo simulations.
Conclusion: Our analyses showed that IDTS intervention is cost-effective compared to the standard of care based a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000. It improved survival at a lower cost. Healthcare systems and payers should consider these results when deciding whether to fund OPAT care coordination services.
1Keller SC, Ciuffetelli D, Bilker W, et al. The Impact of an Infectious Diseases Transition Service on the Care of Outpatients on Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy. J Pharm Technol 2013;29:205-14.

A. Mihailovic,
None
S. Wang, None
K. Kumar, None
D. Timko, None
S. Keller, None