
Methods: MDR was defined as resistance to at least 3 categories of antimicrobials. Susceptibility testing results were interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints. The favorable per-pathogen microbiological response rates for CAZ-AVI and comparators (primarily carbapenem-based therapy) were pooled across five Phase 3 clinical trials (cIAI, cUTI, and a CAZ-resistant pathogen [RP] study of patients with cIAI or cUTI) in the microbiologically modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) analysis set at the test of cure (TOC) visit for MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Results: 43.4% (876/2019) of all mMITT qualifying baseline Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa species were MDR pathogens; 434 MDR pathogens in the CAZ-AVI arm (107 from the cIAI studies, 171 from cUTI and 156 [11 cIAI and 145 cUTI] from RP) and 442 MDR pathogens on comparator arms (125 from cIAI, 167 from cUTI, and 150 [11 cIAI and 139 cUTI] from RP). The results for the favorable per-pathogen microbiological response of MDR pathogens at TOC are shown in the table.
MDR Pathogen |
Favorable per-pathogen response rate (%) |
|
|
CAZ-AVI |
Comparator |
Enterobacteriaceae (all) |
309/403 (76.7) |
292/423 (69.0) |
Escherichia coli | 200/256 (78.1) |
180/253 (71.1) |
74/94 (78.7) |
74/119 (62.2) |
|
12/20 (60.0) |
18/22 (81.8) |
|
23/33 (69.7) |
20/29 (69.0) |
|
Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
22/31 (71.0) |
15/19 (78.9) |
Conclusion: CAZ-AVI was effective in the treatment of patients with cIAI and cUTI caused by MDR pathogens.

G. G. Stone,
AstraZeneca:
Employee
and
Shareholder
,
Salary
P. Newell, AstraZeneca: Employee and Shareholder , Salary
H. Broadhurst, AstraZeneca: Employee and Shareholder , Salary
A. Wardman, AstraZeneca: Employee and Shareholder , Salary
K. Yates, AstraZeneca (former): Independent Contractor , Consulting fee