
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on the medical Clinical Teaching Units (CTU) of the Royal Victoria Hospital (Montreal, Canada). Patients were included if they had a C. difficile PCR on the CTU between January 2014 and September 2015 and their admission diagnosis was not C. difficile. CDI was defined as a patient with a positive toxin assay who received a full course of treatment. Clinical and laboratory data were extracted from hospital records. Independent predictors of CDI were determined by logistic regression.
Results: Data were available on 319 patients, of whom 274 tested negative (86%). Of the 45 patients who tested positive, 43 (95.6%) received treatment. A number of factors were independently associated with CDI, as shown in the table. The area under the receiver-operator curve (c-statistic) for the model was 0.78. An active laxative prescription was unhelpful in ruling out CDI.
Conclusion: Various clinical factors in our cohort seem promising to differentiate between those medical inpatients with CDI and other causes of diarrhea. A preliminary clinical prediction rule derived from this data (http://goo.gl/xgDao9) will need to be further refined and validated in a larger cohort.
Table – Factors independently associated with CDI in tested patients
Factor |
Odds ratio |
95% Confidence |
P-value |
|
Dialysis |
10.0 |
2.7 |
37.1 |
0.001 |
Peripheral Vascular Disease |
3.6 |
1.1 |
11.4 |
0.028 |
Warrants Empiric Therapy |
3.6 |
1.5 |
8.3 |
0.004 |
Atrial Fibrillation |
2.8 |
1.3 |
5.9 |
0.009 |
Not on Antibiotics |
2.7 |
1.3 |
5.6 |
0.007 |
Previous CDI |
2.3 |
1.0 |
5.2 |
0.039 |
WBC Count ≤ 10 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
0.042 |

K. Demir,
None
T. C. Lee, None