1816. Susceptibility Profiles of Ceftolazane-tazobactam (C-T) and Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) Against Isolates of Multidrug Resistant and Extensively Drug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Session: Poster Abstract Session: Antibacterial Susceptibility Surveillance
Saturday, October 29, 2016
Room: Poster Hall
Posters
  • C_T and CZA poster_final_CJC.pdf (450.7 kB)
  • Background: Nosocomial infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas are increasing in frequency and are difficult to treat. The newer cephalosporin – beta lactamase inhibitor combinations, ceftolazane-tazobactam (C-T) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) have demonstrated activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with activity against isolates resistant to ceftazidime alone or piperacillin-tazobactam. Both cephalosporin-beta lactamase inhibitor antibiotics C-T and CZA are currently approved for use with complicated intra-abdominal infections with addition of metronidazole or complicated urinary tract infections including Pyelonephritis, though use for other indications is not currently approved by the FDA. Published articles showcasing C-T have reported successful treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in off-label use where MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated.

    Methods: Susceptibility testing was performed using E-test agar diffusion methods for 35 clinical isolates of MDR / XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 1 reference strain of P. aeruginosa with testing against all 36 isolates against C-T and 35 against CZA. 22 organisms were isolated from respiratory secretions, 6 from wounds not from an intra-abdominal source, 5 from urine, and 2 from blood. 20 were classified as MDR while 15 were XDR. Breakpoints for susceptibility include susceptible at <=4/4, intermediate at 8/4 and resistant at >16/4 for C-T, and susceptible at <=8/4, and resistant at >16/4 for CZA.

    Results: The modal MIC for C-T was 0.75 mcg/mL and for CZA was 2 mcg/mL. The MICs at which 90% of the isolates tested were inhibited (MIC90) for C-T was >=128 and for CZA was 32. 63% of isolates demonstrated susceptibility to C-T at <=4/4, while 76% of isolates were susceptible to CZA at <=8/4.

    Conclusion: Results of antimicrobial agent testing demonstrate the potential of C-T and CZA to treat susceptible isolates of MDR/XDR Pseudomonas. Results support consideration of these agents as an option to treat respiratory tract infections where extensive resistance leaves no alternative for standard antimicrobial intervention and where use of colistin is not advised or the organism is resistant.

    Christopher Crist, M.D.1, Richard Winn, M.D.1, Kristen Fuhrmann, Pharm.D.2 and Alanna Emrick, MLS (ASCP)3, (1)Internal Medicine / Infectious Disease, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, TX, (2)Pharmacy, University Medical Center, Lubbock, TX, (3)Clinical Laboratory, University Medical Center, Lubbock, TX

    Disclosures:

    C. Crist, None

    R. Winn, None

    K. Fuhrmann, None

    A. Emrick, None

    Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >>

    Findings in the abstracts are embargoed until 12:01 a.m. CDT, Wednesday Oct. 26th with the exception of research findings presented at the IDWeek press conferences.