1947. Influenza Vaccination via Oral Tablet is Protective and Induces a Unique Mucosal Immune Response
Session: Poster Abstract Session: Clinical Trials
Saturday, October 6, 2018
Room: S Poster Hall
  • ID Week Kolhatkar Final Edits 19_sep_18.jpg (8.4 MB)
  • Background: Oral vaccines delivered as tablets offer several advantages over traditional injection-based vaccines including ease of distribution and administration as well as temperature-stable formulation options. Oral vaccination is also advantageous because it directly induces a strong mucosal response, which is thought to be critical for preventing future infections. Here we present results from a phase II clinical challenge study comparing efficacy of an oral recombinant adenovirus-based vaccine expressing hemagluttinin (HA) from A/California 04/09 to that of a commercial injectable quadrivalent (QIV) influenza vaccine.

    Methods: In this 2016-2017 clinical trial (NCT02918006), subjects were immunized with either oral vaccine, QIV, or placebo and then challenged 90 days post-immunization with wildtype influenza A H1 virus to measure vaccine efficacy and durability. Protection was assessed by measuring changes in HAI titres, microneutralization, and IgA/IgG ASC assays. Additionally, exploratory flow cytometry evaluated quantitative and qualitative aspects of immunogenicity including markers of activation and mucosal homing on B cells. Analysis was performed on days 0 and 7 post-immunization and 0 and 6 days post-viral challenge. Plasmablasts sorted from PBMCs were then isolated for genomic DNA and sequenced for heavy chain receptor sequencing using NGS analysis.

    Results: Of the subjects immunized with Vaxart’s oral tablet vaccine, 48% were protected. QIV, by comparison, protected 38% of immunized individuals. Only 37% of Vaxart subjects developed influenza infection compared to 44% of QIV subjects and 71% of placebo subjects. While both vaccines induced a humoral immune response, FACS analysis and NGS revealed that Vaxart subjects had more activated plasmablasts expressing surface mucosal homing markers and a more diverse B cell population than QIV subjects.

    Conclusion: Vaxart’s oral influenza tablet vaccine protected against influenza infection as well or better than injectable QIV. However, the mechanism of protection appears to be unique to the route of immunization; oral immunization allows for specific homing of influenza specific B cells to sites of infection and produces a more diverse antibody repertoire.

    Nikita Kolhatkar, PhD, Keith Gottlieb, PhD, Kassandra Kasparek, BS, Katie Hodgson, BS, Sean Tucker, PhD and David Liebowitz, M.D., PhD, Vaxart, Inc., South San Francisco, CA


    N. Kolhatkar, Vaxart, Inc.: Employee , Salary .

    K. Gottlieb, Vaxart, Inc.: Employee , Salary .

    K. Kasparek, Vaxart, Inc.: Employee , Salary .

    K. Hodgson, Vaxart, Inc.: Employee , Salary .

    S. Tucker, Vaxart, Inc: Employee , Salary .

    D. Liebowitz, Vaxart, Inc.: Employee and Investigator , Salary .

    See more of: Clinical Trials
    See more of: Poster Abstract Session
    Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >>

    Findings in the abstracts are embargoed until 12:01 a.m. PDT, Wednesday Oct. 3rd with the exception of research findings presented at the IDWeek press conferences.