285. Challenging The Dogmas Of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Through A Randomized Controlled Trial
Session: Poster Abstract Session: Bone and Joint Infections
Thursday, October 4, 2018
Room: S Poster Hall
Posters
  • Poster_RCT_cellulitis_Ibrahim.pdf (1.0 MB)
  • Background:

    Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has shifted from being a novel concept to an accepted model of care for some conditions. However, concerns remain that have limited its broader roll out: the use of daily ceftriaxone regarding its efficacy and impact on antibiotic resistance, intravenous (IV) catheter complications, risk of treating an acute infection directly from the emergency room (ER), and concern that OPAT has shifted the burden of cost from hospitals to patients. We aimed to address these questions with the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) of OPAT efficacy in children: comparing OPAT directly from the ER using IV ceftriaxone with hospitalization using IV flucloxacillin for moderate/severe cellulitis.

    Methods:

    The RCT was set at a tertiary pediatric hospital from Jan 2015-Jun 2017. Inclusion criteria: children 6 m-18 y with uncomplicated cellulitis needing IV antibiotics. Patients were randomized to ceftriaxone via OPAT at home or flucloxacillin in hospital, using a peripheral catheter. Primary outcome: treatment failure within 48 hours due to lack of improvement or adverse events. Secondary outcomes: complications, readmission, acquisition of nasal and stool resistant bacteria and costs.

    Results:

    188 children were randomized: 93 to OPAT and 95 to hospital. In the intention-to-treat population, there was no difference in treatment failure between OPAT and hospital (2% vs 7%, p=0.09). Per protocol, OPAT had less failure (1% vs 8%, p=0.03). There was no increased acquisition of MRSA, ESBL, VRE or C. difficile with OPAT compared to in hospital at 1 week or 3 months (p>0.05). Complication rates were similar (6% vs 7%, p=0.78), and repeat IV catheterization was less with OPAT (3% vs 15%, p=0.002). Readmission was 1% on OPAT. The cost to families was significantly less with OPAT (AUD213 vs AUD733, p<0.001).

    Conclusion:

    Despite the acuity of the infection, OPAT with IV ceftriaxone for moderate/severe cellulitis in children is efficacious with complications and readmissions no different from hospital care with IV flucloxacillin. Short-term ceftriaxone use in healthy children on OPAT is not associated with increased acquisition of resistant organisms, and has reduced burden of costs to families (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02334124).

    Laila Ibrahim, MBBChBAO1,2,3, Sandy Hopper, MBBS2,4, Francesca Orsini, MSc5, Andrew Daley, MBBS6,7, Franz Babl, MD1,2,4 and Penelope Bryant, BM BCh, PhD2,6,8,9, (1)Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia, (2)Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Australia, (3)The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, (4)Emergency Department, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia, (5)Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Australia, (6)Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia, (7)Microbiology Department, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia, (8)University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia, (9)Rch@Home, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia

    Disclosures:

    L. Ibrahim, None

    S. Hopper, None

    F. Orsini, None

    A. Daley, None

    F. Babl, None

    P. Bryant, None

    Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >>

    Findings in the abstracts are embargoed until 12:01 a.m. PDT, Wednesday Oct. 3rd with the exception of research findings presented at the IDWeek press conferences.