184. Implementation and Evaluation of an Electronic Antimicrobial Prior Authorization Approval Process at a Large Academic Medical Center
Session: Poster Abstract Session: Antimicrobial Stewardship: Interventions Leveraging the Electronic Health Record
Thursday, October 4, 2018
Room: S Poster Hall

Background:

Prior authorization (PA) of antimicrobial agents is recommended by CDC as a core antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) intervention and has been a cornerstone of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (HUP) AMS program since its inception. Previously, prescribers called the PA pager, waited for a callback, discussed the case with the AMS team, and received approval or an alternative recommendation. The objective of this study was to implement a new electronic prior authorization approval platform within existing clinical decision support software (CDSS) and evaluate its utilization.

Methods:

Electronic PA was introduced to HUP prescribers in 1/2017. At the point of order entry for a restricted agent, an approver's name is a required field. In the CDSS, the request is initiated by selecting the patient and indication for use. The next screen displays additional risk factors to select and auto-populates the patient’s current and historic cultures. The requestor selects the relevant cultures and desired antimicrobial(s), enters contact information, and submits the request. Review and approval by AMS team is completed in the CDSS, often without requiring a phone call. Pharmacy views a log of requests to determine if the name given on the order as approver is true. Process metrics were evaluated using a retrospective cohort study from 1/2017 through 12/2017.

Results:

There were 437 unique users of the PA system. Uptake over time is displayed in Figure 1. 1934 unique patients had 3329 requests submitted. The most frequent indications were for prophylaxis, other, and pneumonia. Levofloxacin was most commonly requested (36.76%, 1297 of 3528), followed by meropenem, caspofungin, and fluconazole. 88.7% (2952 of 3329) of overall requests approved. Frequency of PA requests by hour is presented in Figure 2. During AMS hours, the median time to response was 18 (8-42) minutes. 18.4% (649 of 3528) of requests were submitted during off hours. 

Figure 1. Cumulative total of new requestors

Figure 2. Frequency of PA requests by hour

Conclusion:

Based on user uptake and response times, electronic PA was successfully implemented at HUP. Software to facilitate PA shows promise to assist in facilitating PA and tracking relevant process metrics.

Jimish Mehta, PharmD, MSCE1, Jonathan Olson, BS2, W Joseph Ketcherside, MD2, Lauren Hunt, PharmD, BCPS2, Brandon Palermo, MD, MPH2 and Keith Hamilton, MD3, (1)ILÚM Health Solutions, Kenilworth, NJ, (2)ILUM Health Solutions, Kenilworth, NJ, (3)Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Disclosures:

J. Mehta, ILUM Health Solutions: Consultant , Salary .

J. Olson, ILUM Health Solutions: Consultant , Salary .

W. J. Ketcherside, ILUM Health Solutions: Consultant , Salary .

L. Hunt, ILUM Health Solutions: Consultant , Salary .

B. Palermo, ILUM Health Solutions: Employee , Salary .

K. Hamilton, None

Findings in the abstracts are embargoed until 12:01 a.m. PDT, Wednesday Oct. 3rd with the exception of research findings presented at the IDWeek press conferences.